Coursework 2
F. study all the sources.
'Haig was an uncaring General, who sacrificed the lives of his soildiers for no good reason'
How far do these sources support this veiw?
Source A
In source A he seems to come across as unkind... or is he just honest. It does support the quote in some context, although it could just be showing hes honest. I believe it is biased because he adds, "The nation must be prepared to see heavy casualty lists." Now if I was A General Id want to win the war with as little casualties as possible, but he doesn't seem to care. He expects it, so when he hears an enormas ammount of mens lives were lost, he won't be shocked.
Source B
Source B does not seem to support the quote, General Haig is saying that everything went well, and it was brilliantly planned (giving himself A pat on the back). He talks about how several of the troops said "they have never before been so instructed and informed of the nature of the operation before them. The barbed wire has never been so well cut, nor the artillery preparation so thorough." I can only wonder what the rest thought, 570,000 men had died on that first day but this is not featured in the extract so It does not support the veiw.
Source C
Source C does support the quote, it features description of the carnage what took place in the Battle of the Somme. "It was clear that there were no gaps in the wire at the point of attack." The fact that Haig was no where near the front line, is the reason he didn't know. Its been said that the wrong shells were used, instead of breaking the wire it just lifted it up and brought it down, often in A worse tangle than before. I think the fact he sent the men out in these conditions is uncaring. Sacrificing men did not phase him, he seems to have an out look on the situation where he has an infinate ammount of men he can just keep throwing at the German lines. This is A loss of many lives for no reason at all.
Source D
Source D supports the quote about Haig, its just trying to tell A message through comedy. "Haig is about to make yet another "giant" effort to move his drinks cabinet six inches closer to Berlin." This shows that Haig does no care for the lives of his men. He is losing many lives for little ground.
Source E
Source E supports the quote which referes to Haig as A butcher. He is uncaring, he expects these men to go over the top with A high chance of dying when he isn't even near the front line. "The absence of the General". Which means he isn't even going to be at the battle. How would this affect morale? In A negative way I think. Its like A coach who does not turn up to his teams football match. I think its quite selfish of him to not even be near the battle.
Source F
Source F is supporting that Haig is A butcher, it is A passage wrote for A book named "British Butchers and Bunglers of World War." It referes to his lack of care and consideration for the lives of these men, "if he could kill more Germans, than Germans could kill his men, then at some time he would win the war." This is A prime example of his lack of care.
Source G
Source G also supports the quote, "The battle of the Somme had no great importance". That sums it up in one. It didn't have no importance although it cost millions upon millions of lives. Men fought and died for absolutely nothing, this appauls me. I think it would have been better not to send men over the top but wait for the other side to do so. Therefor the casualties were low and the Germans were losing men. The only thing that The Battle of the Somme attributed too was raising morale. A speech would have raised morale, instead it took alot of lives.
Source H
I think source H does not support the quote that Haig was A butcher. "Germany's spirit of resistance was broken, mainly by the courage and resolution of Haigs armies, which had complete confidence in the leadership of there Commander." Its commending Haig and his stratergies. Although it was another General, he could have been Haigs friends. He also fought in both wars which means he may have got them mixed up.
Source I
Source I does not agree with the quote, because its A letter congratulating him on his work. "I congratulate you most warmly on the skill with which your plans were laid." This is A possitive source commending Haig.
Source J
Source J is negative, and does support the quote. He talks about how "The Somme would not have saved us from A stalemate." The Americans were the the reason we won. Our troops were hungry, tired, sick of the mud and morning the deaths of there friends. I saw in A program that our men were giving up all hope, then the Americans came. They had not fought so they did not despair, where as the German soildiers were also sick of it. The Somme was basically A waste of men from both sides. Many men were killed from each sides, pointless deaths. Its sickening.
Conclusion
I think that Haig did not care for his men, although I don't think it was his intention to kill all the men that died. He expected many to die but when so many died on the first day, he tryed to cover it up sending out that report about how marvelous things had gone. "Clock work", Whats so good about gaining little ground and losing 570,000 men? That isn't an achievement! Thats A tradgedy! I guess to him, A death of 1 is A tradgedy, A death of 570,000 is just A statistic. Although I would not call him A butcher. We could have lost all those men and lost the Battle for the Somme.